Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
Based on 119,538 user benchmarks for the AMD HD 5770 and the Nvidia GT 1030, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 651 GPUs. The HD 5770 has a 300 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 9500 GT.This results in the HD 5770 providing 25.2. Drm file player.
- The Radeon HD 5770 was a mid-range graphics card by ATI, launched in October 2009. NVIDIA GeForce 457.51 WHQL AMD Radeon Adrenalin 20.11.
- The HD 5770 has a 300 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GT 240.This results in the HD 5770 providing 16.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance.
- GeForce GT 430 1GB vs Radeon HD 5770. Intro The GeForce GT 430 1GB comes with clock speeds of 700 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 96 SPUs as well as 16 Texture Address Units and 4 ROPs. Compare all that to the Radeon HD 5770, which comes with clock speeds of 850 MHz on the GPU, and 1200 MHz on the 1024 MB.
Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Reasons to consider the
ATiRadeon HD 5770 | Report a correction |
|
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 4,800 MHz | vs | 1,600 MHz | 3x higher effective memory clock speed |
|---|
| Higher clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 550 MHz | Around 55% higher clock speed |
|---|
| Higher memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | vs | 25.6 GB/s | Around 3x higher memory bandwidth |
|---|
| Better floating-point performance | 1,360 GFLOPS | vs | 89.6 GFLOPS | Around 15.2x better floating-point performance |
|---|
| More shading units | 800 | vs | 32 | 768 more shading units |
|---|
| Higher texture rate | 34 GTexel/s | vs | 8.8 GTexel/s | More than 3.8x higher texture rate |
|---|
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,200 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 50% higher memory clock speed |
|---|
| Higher pixel rate | 13.6 GPixel/s | vs | 4.4 GPixel/s | More than 3x higher pixel rate |
|---|
| More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 16 | 24 more texture mapping units |
|---|
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors |
|---|
Reasons to consider the
NvidiaGeForce GT 120 Mac | Report a correction |
|
| Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 108W | 2.2x lower TDP |
|---|
Features Key features of the Radeon HD 5770 vs GeForce GT 120 Mac
memory bandwidthRate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rateNumber of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rateSpeed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performanceHow fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading unitsSubcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping unitsBuilt into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
gpu | Radeon HD 5770 | vs | GeForce GT 120 Mac |
|---|
| GPU brand | ATI | Nvidia |
|---|
| GPU name | Juniper | G96 C1 |
|---|
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
|---|
| Clock speed | 850 MHz | 550 MHz |
|---|
| Is dual GPU | No | No |
|---|
| Reference card | None | None |
|---|
raw performance |
|---|
| Shading units | 800 | 32 |
|---|
| Texture mapping units | 40 | 16 |
|---|
| Render output processors | 16 | 8 |
|---|
| Pixel rate | 13.6 GPixel/s | 4.4 GPixel/s |
|---|
| Texture rate | 34 GTexel/s | 8.8 GTexel/s |
|---|
| Floating-point performance | 1,360 GFLOPS | 89.6 GFLOPS |
|---|
Nvidia Geforce Gt 120 Vs Ati Radeon Hd 5770
Nvidia Geforce Gt 120 Vs Ati Radeon Hd 5770 1024 Mb
memory | Radeon HD 5770 | vs | GeForce GT 120 Mac |
|---|
| Memory clock speed | 1,200 MHz | 800 MHz |
|---|
| Effective memory clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 1,600 MHz |
|---|
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 128 bit |
|---|
| Memory | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
|---|
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
|---|
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
|---|
noise and power |
|---|
| TDP | 108W | 50W |
|---|
